BookFrontier
The Common Mind: an Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics With a New Postscript by Philip Pettit

Book

The Common Mind: an Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics With a New Postscript

Philip Pettit

Oxford University Press · Print & ebook · March 1, 1986

Reading lane: What We Can Know

A Philosophy pick for readers exploring The Common Mind: an Essay on Psychology, Society, and Politics With a New Postscript.

At a Glance

Who It's For

Good for readers who enjoy What We Can KnowGood for fans of PhilosophyGood for readers who enjoy What We Can Know.

Book Details

Authors
Philip Pettit
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Published
March 1, 1986
Format
Print & ebook
Theme
What We Can Know
Reading lane
What We Can Know

Affinity

Publisher Categories

  • What We Can Know

About This Book

What makes human beings intentional and thinking subjects? How does their intentionality and thought connect with their social nature and their communal experience? How do the answers to these questions shape the assumptions which it is legitimate to make in social explanation and political evaluation? These are the broad-ranging issues which Pettit addresses in this novel study. The Common Mind argues for an original way of marking off thinking subjects, in particular human...

Read full description

What makes human beings intentional and thinking subjects? How does their intentionality and thought connect with their social nature and their communal experience? How do the answers to these questions shape the assumptions which it is legitimate to make in social explanation and political evaluation? These are the broad-ranging issues which Pettit addresses in this novel study. The Common Mind argues for an original way of marking off thinking subjects, in particular human beings, from other intentional systems, natural and artificial. It holds by the holistic view that human thought requires communal resources while denying that this social connection compromises the autonomy of individuals. And, in developing the significance of this view of social subjects--this holistic individualism--it outlines a novel framework for social and political theory. Within this framework, social theory is allowed to follow any of a number of paths: space is found for intentional interpretation and decision-theoretic reconstruction, for structural explanation and rational choice derivation. But political theory is treated less ecumenically. The framework raises serious questions about contractarian and atomistic modes of thought and it points the way to a republican rethinking of liberal commitments.

Similar Books